The Senate blocked the CLARITY Act: what changes for buyers

On September 15, 2026, the US Senate voted 49 to 50 against advancing the CLARITY Act, the crypto market-structure bill, so the rules for buying crypto in the United States stay as they were.

The vote was procedural. It did not reject the bill's text. It declined to open floor debate on it, and without that step the Senate cannot amend or pass anything.

What the vote was

The bill is H.R. 3633, the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act. The House passed it on July 17, 2025 by 294 to 134, with 216 Republicans and 78 Democrats voting yes (House roll call 199).

In the Senate, the first hurdle is the motion to proceed, the motion that puts a bill on the floor. Ending debate on that motion takes cloture, and cloture takes three-fifths of the Senate, which is 60 votes. The Senate floor log records that a cloture motion on the motion to proceed to H.R. 3633 was presented during the session that ran into Saturday, August 8, 2026, just before the August recess. The vote was held on September 15, 2026 at 2:19 p.m. and recorded as Senate roll call vote 234.

The motion fell short of a simple majority as well as of 60. No Democrat voted yes.

What the bill would have done

The CLARITY Act would have written into law the split between the two market regulators that US crypto has argued over for a decade. Under current law, the Securities and Exchange Commission claims assets that are securities, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission claims commodities, and no statute says which crypto assets fall on which side.

The Senate was working from a newer text than the one the House passed. According to the Congressional Research Service, Senator Cynthia Lummis published draft language on September 14, 2026 for an amendment in the nature of a substitute. The draft combined the House bill with text from the Senate Banking and Senate Agriculture Committees. CRS summarizes its main provisions as follows:

• CFTC jurisdiction. The CFTC would get exclusive jurisdiction over cash or spot market sales of digital commodities. Digital commodity exchanges, brokers, and dealers would have to register with it.
• An SEC exemption. The SEC would write rules exempting certain token offerings from securities registration, with a $200 million cap on what an issuer could raise under the exemption, and disclosure duties that end once the issuer certifies its own efforts are no longer a primary factor in the token's value.
• Customer protections. Customer assets would have to be segregated from the intermediary's own funds, with limited exceptions. The bankruptcy code would be amended to treat people holding digital assets through an intermediary as customers, with the property protections other customer assets already have.
• Anti-money-laundering rules. Registered exchanges, brokers, and dealers would become financial institutions under the Bank Secrecy Act. Crypto kiosk operators would have to register as money transmitting businesses, and new kiosk customers' transactions would be held for 72 hours.
• Self-custody. Federal agencies could not stop people from using self custody wallets for any lawful purpose.
• Stablecoin yield. Third parties could not pay stablecoin holders yield that is economically or functionally equivalent to deposit interest. Payments tied to bona fide transactions would still be allowed.
• Ethics. Public officials, including the President, Vice President, and members of Congress, would be barred from issuing or sponsoring digital assets in exchange for consideration.

Why it failed

The roll call records votes, not reasons. Reporting by CoinDesk and American Banker says talks between the parties broke down over the ethics section, with Democrats seeking wider limits on federal officials and their families profiting from the crypto industry. American Banker also reported a separate dispute over stablecoin yield, where banks argued that yield-bearing products could pull deposits away from smaller lenders.

What happens next

The bill is not formally dead. After the vote, Senator Thom Tillis entered a motion to reconsider it, according to the Senate floor log for September 15, 2026. That keeps the question open and lets the Senate hold the cloture vote again without starting over. As of September 30, 2026, the Senate floor logs show no further action on H.R. 3633.

The calendar is working against it. Midterm elections are on November 3, 2026, and the 119th Congress ends on January 3, 2027. A bill that has not been enacted by then expires, and supporters would have to reintroduce it in the next Congress and repeat the committee process. American Banker reported that the failed vote likely means the bill will not be taken up again until the next Congress.

Meanwhile, the regulators keep working under the laws they already administer. The one federal crypto statute on the books, the GENIUS Act for payment stablecoins, became law on July 18, 2025 and is unaffected by this vote.

What it changes for a US buyer

Very little, and that is the practical point. The CLARITY Act was not law before September 15, 2026, and it is not law now. Everything that decides whether and how you can buy crypto in the US works the way it did before the vote:

• An exchange that takes your dollars is a money services business under FinCEN guidance and needs a money transmitter license in each state it serves. That is still why an exchange can be open in one state and closed in the next. Our guide to whether crypto is legal in the United States explains the layers.
• Exchanges still run kyc checks before you can deposit, because the federal anti-money-laundering rules behind them do not depend on this bill.
• Tax reporting does not change. Brokers still report your sales on form 1099 da, under IRS rules that are separate from market-structure legislation.
• The customer protections in the bill, statutory segregation and customer status in bankruptcy, do not exist at the federal level. How your coins are held on an exchange is still set by its user agreement and whatever state rules apply to it. Our guide to self-custody versus exchange custody sets out the trade-off.

Which exchanges serve US residents is a licensing question, not a legislative one, and the current list is at Exchanges available in United States.

Frequently asked questions